Skip to content

Bayer Leverkusen vs SC Freiburg — market analysis & odds

Read this match in three steps

Probability is the common language. Venue prices are translated underneath so sportsbook and prediction-market users can compare the same idea.

  1. 1 · Most likely result

    Bayer Leverkusen

    60% means we estimate about 60 chances out of 100. It is not a guarantee.

    Overall: Bayer Leverkusen 60% · Draw 21% · SC Freiburg 19%

  2. 2 · Understand the price

    Bayer Leverkusen

    1.68 decimal odds

    Betsson · US −147

    collected

    This is not a dollar amount. A 1-unit stake would return 1.68 units total if successful.

  3. 3 · Compare probability

    +0.6 percentage points

    Our estimate is 60%; the price implies 60%. A positive difference is a reason to investigate, not proof of profit.

    Potential value to investigate

Updated · overall, market, and model views are labeled separately

Expert analysisFull detail remains available

Why the model and market differ

Market and model are independent views, not competing answers. Their difference is shown in percentage points (pp) and is a prompt to investigate assumptions or missing information.

Bayer Leverkusenmodel 68% · market 57% (model vs market +11.1pp)
Drawmodel 18% · market 21% (model vs market −3.3pp)
SC Freiburgmodel 13% · market 21% (model vs market −7.8pp)

Market = probability from the designated reference market after bookmaker margin is removed. Model = independent Dixon-Coles-adjusted simulation. The Quick read uses the separately labeled overall estimate, which combines these inputs.

Every market, every book, and how the price moved

For each market: the reference book’s price with its margin removed, the most favourable price we collected and where, the difference between them, and the price history over the last 72 hours. Prices move — check the venue before acting.

Match result (1X2)

no-vig from Pinnacle alone · 24 books quote this market · margin removed 5.6%

  • Bayer Leverkusen

    1.68 at Betsson +1

    collected

    no-vig reference 1.7457.4% implieddifference −2.1pp

  • Draw

    4.50 at Tipico

    collected

    no-vig reference 4.6821.4% implieddifference −0.8pp

  • SC Freiburg

    4.70 at Marathonbet

    collected

    no-vig reference 4.7121.2% implieddifference −0.0pp

Bayer Leverkusen held from 1.65 to 1.65 (+0.0%) over 24h, measured on Pinnacle.

1.313.195.0625 Sept, 10 UTC28 Sept, 09 UTC
Bayer LeverkusenDrawSC Freiburg
Each hour, the best price offered by any book quoting this outcome — 24 books throughout across the window. Because the set of quoting books changes hour to hour, a step in the line can be a book arriving or leaving rather than a price moving; the movement figure above is measured on one book across two timestamps precisely to avoid that. Every hour in the window was collected. The no-vig reference is a separate calculation, from Pinnacle alone.
Every book’s current price — 24 venues collected
Current decimal price at every collected book for Match result (1X2). The best price in each column is marked.
BookBayer LeverkusenDrawSC FreiburgCollected
888sport1.614.204.40
Betclic1.593.984.20
Betfred1.674.334.60
BetMGM1.674.204.60
BetssonBest price: 1.684.004.65
Betway1.614.334.20
Bovada1.664.454.45
BoyleSports1.574.204.00
Coral1.674.204.60
FanDuel1.594.404.60
Ladbrokes1.654.204.50
LeoVegas1.624.204.30
Marathonbet1.664.40Best price: 4.70
NordicBet1.684.054.65
Paddy Power1.604.204.50
Pinnacle1.654.434.46
Sky Bet1.624.334.50
Suprabets1.614.204.30
Tipico1.65Best price: 4.504.40
Unibet1.654.204.35
Unibet1.553.904.10
William Hill1.624.204.40
Winamax1.584.003.95
Winamax1.563.903.85

Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.

Total goals 2.5

no-vig from William Hill alone · 3 books quote this market · margin removed 7.6%

  • Over 2.5

    1.49 at Betsson

    collected

    no-vig reference 1.5564.5% implieddifference −2.6pp

  • Under 2.5

    2.67 at Betsson

    collected

    no-vig reference 2.8235.5% implieddifference −2.0pp

Over 2.5 held from 1.44 to 1.44 (+0.0%) over 24h, measured on William Hill.

1.352.082.8125 Sept, 10 UTC28 Sept, 09 UTC
Over 2.5Under 2.5
Each hour, the best price offered by any book quoting this outcome — 3 books throughout across the window. Because the set of quoting books changes hour to hour, a step in the line can be a book arriving or leaving rather than a price moving; the movement figure above is measured on one book across two timestamps precisely to avoid that. Every hour in the window was collected. The no-vig reference is a separate calculation, from William Hill alone.
Every book’s current price — 3 venues collected
Current decimal price at every collected book for Total goals 2.5. The best price in each column is marked.
BookOver 2.5Under 2.5Collected
BetssonBest price: 1.49Best price: 2.67
NordicBet1.472.62
William Hill1.442.62

Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.

Total goals 3.5

3 books pricing this market · no reference book quoted every outcome, so no no-vig price is shown

  • Over 3.5

    2.10 at Tipico

    collected

    no-vig reference —difference —

  • Under 3.5

    1.69 at BetMGM

    collected

    no-vig reference —difference —

No reference-book quote from 24 hours ago, so no movement is claimed for this market.

1.631.952.2625 Sept, 10 UTC28 Sept, 09 UTC
Over 3.5Under 3.5
Each hour, the best price offered by any book quoting this outcome — 3 books throughout across the window. Because the set of quoting books changes hour to hour, a step in the line can be a book arriving or leaving rather than a price moving; the movement figure above is measured on one book across two timestamps precisely to avoid that. Every hour in the window was collected.
Every book’s current price — 3 venues collected
Current decimal price at every collected book for Total goals 3.5. The best price in each column is marked.
BookOver 3.5Under 3.5Collected
BetMGM2.05Best price: 1.69
LeoVegas2.081.64
TipicoBest price: 2.101.67

Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.

Both teams to score

no-vig from William Hill alone · 6 books quote this market · margin removed 6.7%

  • Both teams score

    1.50 at Betfred +2

    collected

    no-vig reference 1.6062.5% implieddifference −4.2pp

  • Not both teams score

    2.55 at Paddy Power

    collected

    no-vig reference 2.6737.5% implieddifference −1.7pp

Both teams score held from 1.50 to 1.50 (+0.0%) over 24h, measured on William Hill.

1.372.022.6825 Sept, 10 UTC28 Sept, 09 UTC
Both teams scoreNot both teams score
Each hour, the best price offered by any book quoting this outcome — 6 books throughout across the window. Because the set of quoting books changes hour to hour, a step in the line can be a book arriving or leaving rather than a price moving; the movement figure above is measured on one book across two timestamps precisely to avoid that. Every hour in the window was collected. The no-vig reference is a separate calculation, from William Hill alone.
Every book’s current price — 6 venues collected
Current decimal price at every collected book for Both teams to score. The best price in each column is marked.
BookBoth teams scoreNot both teams scoreCollected
BetfredBest price: 1.502.50
Coral1.502.50
Ladbrokes1.482.45
LeoVegas1.482.45
Paddy Power1.45Best price: 2.55
William Hill1.502.50

Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.

Evidence and inputs

  • Monte Carlo simulation: 50,000 runs (engine v1.1-dc-poisson-mktshares).
  • Rest: Bayer Leverkusen 28d, SC Freiburg 29d since last match.
  • League scoring baseline: 3.1 goals/game.
  • Home advantage applied for Bayer Leverkusen.
  • Lineups unconfirmed at last model run.

Potential value to investigate

No current price clears the publication threshold.

The market may be close to the estimate, the available data may be incomplete, or the price may have moved. Passing is a valid result.

Open the price-comparison viewEvery current comparison, with the price history and rationale, in the app.

Questions

Who is most likely to win Bayer Leverkusen vs SC Freiburg?

Clauseground's combined estimate — a Dixon-Coles-adjusted model combined with a no-vig designated reference market — makes Bayer Leverkusen the most likely outcome at 60%. That is a probability, not a promise: the other outcomes carry the remaining 40%.

How does Clauseground predict Bayer Leverkusen vs SC Freiburg?

Clauseground uses an independent Poisson model with a Dixon-Coles low-score correction and removes the margin from a complete designated reference market. It shows the model and market views separately, then may calculate a market-specific combined estimate. Each probability retains its source label and timestamp.

Decision support, not betting advice. No guaranteed outcomes. 18+/21+ where applicable. Gamble responsibly.

Probabilities are labeled by source — market, model, or combined. How the model works →