Skip to content
CLAUSEGROUND.
Menu
Bundesliga

Werder Bremen vs SC Paderborn — market analysis & odds

Quick readAlready know odds? Jump to expert analysis ↓

Read this match in three steps

Probability is the common language. Venue prices are translated underneath so sportsbook and prediction-market users can compare the same idea.

  1. 1 · Most likely result

    Werder Bremen

    50% means we estimate about 50 chances out of 100. It is not a guarantee.

    Overall: Werder Bremen 50% · Draw 24% · SC Paderborn 26%

  2. 2 · Understand the price

    SC Paderborn

    4.00 decimal odds

    Coral · US +300

    collected

    This is not a dollar amount. A 1-unit stake would return 4.00 units total if successful.

  3. 3 · Compare probability

    +1.3 percentage points

    Our estimate is 26%; the price implies 25%. A positive difference is a reason to investigate, not proof of profit.

    Potential value to investigate

Updated · overall, market, and model views are labeled separately

Expert analysisFull detail remains available

Why the model and market differ

Market and model are independent views, not competing answers. Their difference is shown in percentage points (pp) and is a prompt to investigate assumptions or missing information.

Werder Bremenmodel 43% · market 52% (model vs market −9.2pp)
Drawmodel 26% · market 23% (model vs market +2.8pp)
SC Paderbornmodel 31% · market 25% (model vs market +6.3pp)

Market = probability from the designated reference market after bookmaker margin is removed. Model = independent Dixon-Coles-adjusted simulation. The Quick read uses the separately labeled overall estimate, which combines these inputs.

Every market, every book, and how the price moved

For each market: the reference book’s price with its margin removed, the most favourable price we collected and where, the difference between them, and the price history over the last 72 hours. Prices move — check the venue before acting.

Match result (1X2)

no-vig from Pinnacle alone · 25 books quote this market · margin removed 5.4%

  • Werder Bremen

    1.85 at Betsson +1

    collected

    no-vig reference 1.9351.8% implieddifference −2.2pp

  • Draw

    4.05 at Bovada

    collected

    no-vig reference 4.2623.5% implieddifference −1.2pp

  • SC Paderborn

    4.00 at Coral +2

    collected

    no-vig reference 4.0524.7% implieddifference −0.3pp

Werder Bremen held from 1.83 to 1.83 (+0.0%) over 24h, measured on Pinnacle.

1.592.954.3125 Sept, 10 UTC28 Sept, 09 UTC
Werder BremenDrawSC Paderborn
Each hour, the best price offered by any book quoting this outcome — 25 books throughout across the window. Because the set of quoting books changes hour to hour, a step in the line can be a book arriving or leaving rather than a price moving; the movement figure above is measured on one book across two timestamps precisely to avoid that. Every hour in the window was collected. The no-vig reference is a separate calculation, from Pinnacle alone.
Every book’s current price — 25 venues collected
Current decimal price at every collected book for Match result (1X2). The best price in each column is marked.
BookWerder BremenDrawSC PaderbornCollected
888sport1.833.753.75
Betclic1.773.633.58
Betfred1.834.003.75
BetMGM1.833.903.90
BetssonBest price: 1.853.803.90
Betway1.774.003.60
Bovada1.83Best price: 4.053.85
BoyleSports1.753.803.50
Coral1.833.90Best price: 4.00
DraftKings1.803.753.60
FanDuel1.773.903.90
Ladbrokes1.833.903.90
LeoVegas1.833.753.65
Marathonbet1.844.004.00
NordicBet1.853.853.95
Paddy Power1.753.803.80
Pinnacle1.834.043.84
Sky Bet1.803.903.80
Suprabets1.793.883.67
Tipico1.804.004.00
Unibet1.843.753.70
Unibet1.733.603.50
William Hill1.833.753.75
Winamax1.763.653.40
Winamax1.743.553.35

Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.

Total goals 2.5

no-vig from William Hill alone · 5 books quote this market · margin removed 6.2%

  • Over 2.5

    1.60 at Betsson

    collected

    no-vig reference 1.6560.8% implieddifference −1.7pp

  • Under 2.5

    2.40 at Tipico +1

    collected

    no-vig reference 2.5539.2% implieddifference −2.4pp

Over 2.5 held from 1.55 to 1.55 (+0.0%) over 24h, measured on William Hill.

1.502.002.5025 Sept, 10 UTC28 Sept, 09 UTC
Over 2.5Under 2.5
Each hour, the best price offered by any book quoting this outcome — 4–5 books across the window. Because the set of quoting books changes hour to hour, a step in the line can be a book arriving or leaving rather than a price moving; the movement figure above is measured on one book across two timestamps precisely to avoid that. Every hour in the window was collected. The no-vig reference is a separate calculation, from William Hill alone.
Every book’s current price — 5 venues collected
Current decimal price at every collected book for Total goals 2.5. The best price in each column is marked.
BookOver 2.5Under 2.5Collected
BetssonBest price: 1.602.36
LeoVegas1.532.30
NordicBet1.582.32
Tipico1.55Best price: 2.40
William Hill1.552.40

Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.

Both teams to score

no-vig from William Hill alone · 6 books quote this market · margin removed 5.3%

  • Both teams score

    1.55 at William Hill

    collected

    no-vig reference 1.6361.3% implieddifference −3.3pp

  • Not both teams score

    2.45 at William Hill

    collected

    no-vig reference 2.5838.8% implieddifference −2.1pp

Both teams score held from 1.55 to 1.55 (+0.0%) over 24h, measured on William Hill.

1.442.002.5625 Sept, 10 UTC28 Sept, 09 UTC
Both teams scoreNot both teams score
Each hour, the best price offered by any book quoting this outcome — 6 books throughout across the window. Because the set of quoting books changes hour to hour, a step in the line can be a book arriving or leaving rather than a price moving; the movement figure above is measured on one book across two timestamps precisely to avoid that. Every hour in the window was collected. The no-vig reference is a separate calculation, from William Hill alone.
Every book’s current price — 6 venues collected
Current decimal price at every collected book for Both teams to score. The best price in each column is marked.
BookBoth teams scoreNot both teams scoreCollected
Betfred1.532.38
Coral1.532.37
Ladbrokes1.532.37
LeoVegas1.522.40
Paddy Power1.502.40
William HillBest price: 1.55Best price: 2.45

Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.

Evidence and inputs

  • Monte Carlo simulation: 50,000 runs (engine v1.1-dc-poisson-mktshares).
  • Rest: Werder Bremen 28d, SC Paderborn 27d since last match.
  • League scoring baseline: 3.1 goals/game.
  • Home advantage applied for Werder Bremen.
  • Lineups unconfirmed at last model run.

Potential value to investigate

SC Paderborn

Match result+1.9pp differencecombined

4.10 at Marathonbet

combined fair 3.8125 books priced this outcomeno 24h reference

combined estimate 26%model 31% · market 25% (model vs market +6.3pp)

estimate 26% · price implies 24% · +7.7% expected return if the estimate is right

Combined estimate puts SC Paderborn at 26%; best collected price 4.10 at marathonbet implies 24% — a +1.9pp calculated difference, not a guaranteed edge.

priced

Open the price-comparison viewEvery current comparison, with the price history and rationale, in the app.

Questions

Who is most likely to win Werder Bremen vs SC Paderborn?

Clauseground's combined estimate — a Dixon-Coles-adjusted model combined with a no-vig designated reference market — makes Werder Bremen the most likely outcome at 50%. That is a probability, not a promise: the other outcomes carry the remaining 50%.

How does Clauseground predict Werder Bremen vs SC Paderborn?

Clauseground uses an independent Poisson model with a Dixon-Coles low-score correction and removes the margin from a complete designated reference market. It shows the model and market views separately, then may calculate a market-specific combined estimate. Each probability retains its source label and timestamp.

Decision support, not betting advice. No guaranteed outcomes. 18+/21+ where applicable. Gamble responsibly.

Probabilities are labeled by source — market, model, or combined. How the model works →