Atlanta United FC vs FC Cincinnati — market analysis & odds
Read this match in three steps
Probability is the common language. Venue prices are translated underneath so sportsbook and prediction-market users can compare the same idea.
1 · Most likely result
FC Cincinnati
39% means we estimate about 39 chances out of 100. It is not a guarantee.
Overall: Atlanta United FC 37% · Draw 24% · FC Cincinnati 39%
2 · Understand the price
FC Cincinnati
2.72 decimal odds
Betsson · US +172
collected
This is not a dollar amount. A 1-unit stake would return 2.72 units total if successful.
3 · Compare probability
+2.3 percentage points
Our estimate is 39%; the price implies 37%. A positive difference is a reason to investigate, not proof of profit.
Potential value to investigate
Updated · overall, market, and model views are labeled separately
Why the model and market differ
Market and model are independent views, not competing answers. Their difference is shown in percentage points (pp) and is a prompt to investigate assumptions or missing information.
Market = probability from the designated reference market after bookmaker margin is removed. Model = independent Dixon-Coles-adjusted simulation. The Quick read uses the separately labeled overall estimate, which combines these inputs.
Every market, every book, and how the price moved
For each market: the reference book’s price with its margin removed, the most favourable price we collected and where, the difference between them, and the price history over the last 72 hours. Prices move — check the venue before acting.
Match result (1X2)
no-vig from William Hill alone · 16 books quote this market · margin removed 11.3%
Atlanta United FC
2.32 at Betsson +2
collected
no-vig reference 2.5639.1% implieddifference −4.0pp
Draw
4.00 at FanDuel +1
collected
no-vig reference 4.0125.0% implieddifference −0.0pp
FC Cincinnati
2.72 at Betsson +1
collected
no-vig reference 2.7836.0% implieddifference −0.8pp
Atlanta United FC held from 2.30 to 2.30 (+0.0%) over 24h, measured on William Hill.
Every book’s current price — 16 venues collected
| Book | Atlanta United FC | Draw | FC Cincinnati | Collected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 888sport | 2.30 | 3.60 | 2.60 | |
| Betclic | 2.13 | 3.68 | 2.50 | |
| Betsson | Best price: 2.32 | 3.85 | Best price: 2.72 | |
| BoyleSports | 2.15 | 3.80 | 2.40 | |
| FanDuel | 2.30 | Best price: 4.00 | 2.65 | |
| LeoVegas | 2.25 | 3.70 | 2.55 | |
| Marathonbet | 2.32 | 3.80 | 2.62 | |
| MyBookie | 2.28 | 3.85 | 2.61 | |
| NordicBet | 2.32 | 3.85 | 2.72 | |
| Paddy Power | 2.30 | 4.00 | 2.62 | |
| Sky Bet | 2.20 | 3.75 | 2.50 | |
| Tipico | 2.30 | 3.90 | 2.55 | |
| Unibet | 2.05 | 3.70 | 2.50 | |
| William Hill | 2.30 | 3.60 | 2.50 | |
| Winamax | 2.15 | 3.75 | 2.45 | |
| Winamax | 2.10 | 3.65 | 2.40 |
Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.
Total goals 2.5
no-vig from William Hill alone · 3 books quote this market · margin removed 9.2%
Over 2.5
1.39 at Betsson +1
collected
no-vig reference 1.4967.3% implieddifference −4.6pp
Under 2.5
2.95 at Betsson +1
collected
no-vig reference 3.0632.7% implieddifference −1.2pp
Over 2.5 held from 1.36 to 1.36 (+0.0%) over 24h, measured on William Hill.
Every book’s current price — 3 venues collected
| Book | Over 2.5 | Under 2.5 | Collected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsson | Best price: 1.39 | Best price: 2.95 | |
| NordicBet | 1.39 | 2.95 | |
| William Hill | 1.36 | 2.80 |
Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.
Total goals 3.5
3 books pricing this market · no reference book quoted every outcome, so no no-vig price is shown
Over 3.5
2.00 at MyBookie +1
collected
no-vig reference —difference —
Under 3.5
1.72 at MyBookie +1
collected
no-vig reference —difference —
No reference-book quote from 24 hours ago, so no movement is claimed for this market.
Every book’s current price — 3 venues collected
| Book | Over 3.5 | Under 3.5 | Collected |
|---|---|---|---|
| LeoVegas | 1.90 | 1.70 | |
| MyBookie | Best price: 2.00 | Best price: 1.72 | |
| Tipico | 2.00 | 1.72 |
Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.
Evidence and inputs
- Monte Carlo simulation: 50,000 runs (engine v1.1-dc-poisson-mktshares).
- Rest: Atlanta United FC 21d, FC Cincinnati 21d since last match.
- League scoring baseline: 3 goals/game.
- Home advantage applied for Atlanta United FC.
- Lineups unconfirmed at last model run.
Potential value to investigate
FC Cincinnati
Match result+1.3pp differencecombined2.65 at FanDuel
combined fair 2.5613 books priced this outcomeno 24h reference
estimate 39% · price implies 38% · +3.4% expected return if the estimate is right
Combined estimate puts FC Cincinnati at 39%; best collected price 2.65 at fanduel implies 38% — a +1.3pp calculated difference, not a guaranteed edge.
priced
Questions
Who is most likely to win Atlanta United FC vs FC Cincinnati?
Clauseground's combined estimate — a Dixon-Coles-adjusted model combined with a no-vig designated reference market — makes FC Cincinnati the most likely outcome at 39%. That is a probability, not a promise: the other outcomes carry the remaining 61%.
How does Clauseground predict Atlanta United FC vs FC Cincinnati?
Clauseground uses an independent Poisson model with a Dixon-Coles low-score correction and removes the margin from a complete designated reference market. It shows the model and market views separately, then may calculate a market-specific combined estimate. Each probability retains its source label and timestamp.