Skip to content

CF Montreal vs FC Cincinnati — market analysis & odds

Final score: 3–1

Final score: CF Montreal 3–1 FC Cincinnati. Pre-match, Clauseground's combined estimate was CF Montreal 34%, the draw 24%, FC Cincinnati 42%. CF Montreal won — an outcome we carried at 34%. The combined estimate leaned FC Cincinnati at 42%; the most likely single result did not occur.

Updated · overall, market, and model views are labeled separately

Expert analysisFull detail remains available

Pre-match model vs market

Market and model are independent views, not competing answers. Their difference is shown in percentage points (pp) and is a prompt to investigate assumptions or missing information.

CF Montrealmodel 34% · market —
Drawmodel 22% · market —
FC Cincinnatimodel 44% · market —

Market = probability from the designated reference market after bookmaker margin is removed. Model = independent Dixon-Coles-adjusted simulation. The Quick read uses the separately labeled overall estimate, which combines these inputs.

Evidence and inputs

  • Monte Carlo simulation: 50,000 runs (engine v1.1-dc-poisson-mktshares).
  • Rest: CF Montreal 7d, FC Cincinnati 7d since last match.
  • League scoring baseline: 3 goals/game.
  • Home advantage applied for CF Montreal.
  • Lineups unconfirmed at last model run.

Questions

Who won CF Montreal vs FC Cincinnati?

CF Montreal won: the final score was CF Montreal 3–1 FC Cincinnati. Clauseground's pre-match blend carried that outcome at 34%. That probability described uncertainty; it did not promise the result.

How does Clauseground predict CF Montreal vs FC Cincinnati?

Clauseground uses an independent Poisson model with a Dixon-Coles low-score correction and removes the margin from a complete designated reference market. It shows the model and market views separately, then may calculate a market-specific combined estimate. Each probability retains its source label and timestamp.

Decision support, not betting advice. No guaranteed outcomes. 18+/21+ where applicable. Gamble responsibly.

Probabilities are labeled by source — market, model, or combined. How the model works →