Skip to content
CLAUSEGROUND.
Menu
Eredivisie

FC Utrecht vs AZ Alkmaar — market analysis & odds

Quick readAlready know odds? Jump to expert analysis ↓

Read this match in three steps

Probability is the common language. Venue prices are translated underneath so sportsbook and prediction-market users can compare the same idea.

  1. 1 · Most likely result

    AZ Alkmaar

    38% means we estimate about 38 chances out of 100. It is not a guarantee.

    Overall: FC Utrecht 37% · Draw 25% · AZ Alkmaar 38%

  2. 2 · Understand the price

    FC Utrecht

    2.88 decimal odds

    Unibet nl · US +188

    collected

    This is not a dollar amount. A 1-unit stake would return 2.88 units total if successful.

  3. 3 · Compare probability

    +2.0 percentage points

    Our estimate is 37%; the price implies 35%. A positive difference is a reason to investigate, not proof of profit.

    Potential value to investigate

Updated · overall, market, and model views are labeled separately

Expert analysisFull detail remains available

Why the model and market differ

Market and model are independent views, not competing answers. Their difference is shown in percentage points (pp) and is a prompt to investigate assumptions or missing information.

FC Utrechtmodel 43% · market 35% (model vs market +8.4pp)
Drawmodel 26% · market 25% (model vs market +0.3pp)
AZ Alkmaarmodel 31% · market 40% (model vs market −8.7pp)

Market = probability from the designated reference market after bookmaker margin is removed. Model = independent Dixon-Coles-adjusted simulation. The Quick read uses the separately labeled overall estimate, which combines these inputs.

Every market, every book, and how the price moved

For each market: the reference book’s price with its margin removed, the most favourable price we collected and where, the difference between them, and the price history over the last 72 hours. Prices move — check the venue before acting.

Match result (1X2)

no-vig from Pinnacle alone · 42 books quote this market · margin removed 5.0%

  • FC Utrecht

    2.88 at Unibet

    collected

    no-vig reference 2.8934.6% implieddifference −0.1pp

  • Draw

    3.85 at Coolbet

    collected

    no-vig reference 3.9425.4% implieddifference −0.6pp

  • AZ Alkmaar

    2.45 at Unibet

    collected

    no-vig reference 2.5040.0% implieddifference −0.8pp

Draw shortened from 3.81 to 3.75 (−1.6%) over 24h, measured on Pinnacle.

2.263.144.0210 Aug, 21 UTC13 Aug, 20 UTC
FC UtrechtDrawAZ Alkmaar
Each hour, the best price offered by any book quoting this outcome — 40–42 books across the window. Because the set of quoting books changes hour to hour, a step in the line can be a book arriving or leaving rather than a price moving; the movement figure above is measured on one book across two timestamps precisely to avoid that. Every hour in the window was collected. The no-vig reference is a separate calculation, from Pinnacle alone.
Every book’s current price — 42 venues collected
Current decimal price at every collected book for Match result (1X2). The best price in each column is marked.
BookFC UtrechtDrawAZ AlkmaarCollected
888sport2.623.502.30
Betano2.703.602.38
BetAnySports2.793.732.36
Betclic2.653.632.25
Betfair Sportsbook2.703.752.30
Betfred2.623.602.30
BetMGM2.703.752.38
BetOnline2.793.732.36
BetRivers2.703.402.30
Betsson2.783.652.38
BetUS2.793.732.36
BetVictor2.703.602.38
Betway2.623.602.30
Bovada2.723.702.36
BoyleSports2.503.752.20
Casumo2.753.502.35
Codere2.703.702.38
Coolbet2.70Best price: 3.852.40
Coral2.703.752.37
DraftKings2.703.652.35
Fanatics2.653.802.30
FanDuel2.753.702.30
Grosvenor2.803.552.38
Ladbrokes2.703.702.37
LeoVegas2.653.352.28
LiveScore Bet2.653.352.28
LowVig2.793.732.36
Marathonbet2.713.622.34
NordicBet2.783.652.38
Paddy Power2.623.602.25
Pinnacle2.753.752.38
PMU2.703.402.30
Sky Bet2.603.502.20
Tipico2.753.702.30
UnibetBest price: 2.883.70Best price: 2.45
Unibet2.753.502.35
Unibet2.703.702.38
Unibet2.653.602.20
Virgin Bet2.653.352.28
William Hill2.623.502.30
Winamax2.553.652.25
Winamax2.503.552.20

Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.

Total goals 2.5

no-vig from William Hill alone · 11 books quote this market · margin removed 7.2%

  • Over 2.5

    1.61 at Casumo +3

    collected

    no-vig reference 1.6859.4% implieddifference −2.7pp

  • Under 2.5

    2.36 at Betsson +1

    collected

    no-vig reference 2.4640.6% implieddifference −1.8pp

Over 2.5 held from 1.57 to 1.57 (+0.0%) over 24h, measured on William Hill.

1.502.012.5210 Aug, 21 UTC13 Aug, 20 UTC
Over 2.5Under 2.5
Each hour, the best price offered by any book quoting this outcome — 10–12 books across the window. Because the set of quoting books changes hour to hour, a step in the line can be a book arriving or leaving rather than a price moving; the movement figure above is measured on one book across two timestamps precisely to avoid that. Every hour in the window was collected. The no-vig reference is a separate calculation, from William Hill alone.
Every book’s current price — 11 venues collected
Current decimal price at every collected book for Total goals 2.5. The best price in each column is marked.
BookOver 2.5Under 2.5Collected
BetMGM1.542.30
BetRivers1.602.25
Betsson1.56Best price: 2.36
CasumoBest price: 1.612.28
Grosvenor1.612.28
LeoVegas1.562.23
NordicBet1.562.36
PMU1.502.12
Unibet1.612.28
Unibet1.612.28
William Hill1.572.30

Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.

Total goals 3

no-vig from Pinnacle alone · 7 books quote this market · margin removed 4.5%

  • Over 3

    1.96 at Pinnacle

    collected

    no-vig reference 2.0548.8% implieddifference −2.2pp

  • Under 3

    1.91 at BetOnline +1

    collected

    no-vig reference 1.9551.2% implieddifference −1.2pp

Under 3 shortened from 1.93 to 1.87 (−3.1%) over 24h, measured on Pinnacle.

1.901.941.9710 Aug, 21 UTC13 Aug, 20 UTC
Over 3Under 3
Each hour, the best price offered by any book quoting this outcome — 6–7 books across the window. Because the set of quoting books changes hour to hour, a step in the line can be a book arriving or leaving rather than a price moving; the movement figure above is measured on one book across two timestamps precisely to avoid that. Every hour in the window was collected. The no-vig reference is a separate calculation, from Pinnacle alone.
Every book’s current price — 7 venues collected
Current decimal price at every collected book for Total goals 3. The best price in each column is marked.
BookOver 3Under 3Collected
BetAnySports1.911.83
BetOnline1.91Best price: 1.91
BetUS1.871.87
Bovada1.951.87
Coolbet1.901.87
LowVig1.911.91
PinnacleBest price: 1.961.87

Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.

Both teams to score

no-vig from William Hill alone · 6 books quote this market · margin removed 9.4%

  • Both teams score

    1.50 at Betfred +2

    collected

    no-vig reference 1.5863.5% implieddifference −3.2pp

  • Not both teams score

    2.50 at Betfred +1

    collected

    no-vig reference 2.7436.5% implieddifference −3.5pp

Both teams score held from 1.44 to 1.44 (+0.0%) over 24h, measured on William Hill.

1.382.002.6210 Aug, 21 UTC13 Aug, 20 UTC
Both teams scoreNot both teams score
Each hour, the best price offered by any book quoting this outcome — 6 books throughout across the window. Because the set of quoting books changes hour to hour, a step in the line can be a book arriving or leaving rather than a price moving; the movement figure above is measured on one book across two timestamps precisely to avoid that. Every hour in the window was collected. The no-vig reference is a separate calculation, from William Hill alone.
Every book’s current price — 6 venues collected
Current decimal price at every collected book for Both teams to score. The best price in each column is marked.
BookBoth teams scoreNot both teams scoreCollected
BetfredBest price: 1.50Best price: 2.50
Coral1.502.45
Ladbrokes1.502.45
LiveScore Bet1.472.45
Virgin Bet1.472.45
William Hill1.442.50

Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.

Evidence and inputs

  • Monte Carlo simulation: 50,000 runs (engine v1.1-dc-poisson-mktshares).
  • Rest: FC Utrecht 6d, AZ Alkmaar 7d since last match.
  • League scoring baseline: 3.2 goals/game.
  • Home advantage applied for FC Utrecht.
  • Lineups unconfirmed at last model run.

Potential value to investigate

FC Utrecht

Match result+2.0pp differencecombined

2.88 at Unibet

combined fair 2.7242 books priced this outcomeno 24h reference

combined estimate 37%model 43% · market 35% (model vs market +8.4pp)

estimate 37% · price implies 35% · +5.8% expected return if the estimate is right

Combined estimate puts FC Utrecht at 37%; best collected price 2.88 at unibet_nl implies 35% — a +2.0pp calculated difference, not a guaranteed edge.

priced

Open the price-comparison viewEvery current comparison, with the price history and rationale, in the app.

Questions

Who is most likely to win FC Utrecht vs AZ Alkmaar?

Clauseground's combined estimate — a Dixon-Coles-adjusted model combined with a no-vig designated reference market — makes AZ Alkmaar the most likely outcome at 38%. That is a probability, not a promise: the other outcomes carry the remaining 62%.

How does Clauseground predict FC Utrecht vs AZ Alkmaar?

Clauseground uses an independent Poisson model with a Dixon-Coles low-score correction and removes the margin from a complete designated reference market. It shows the model and market views separately, then may calculate a market-specific combined estimate. Each probability retains its source label and timestamp.

Decision support, not betting advice. No guaranteed outcomes. 18+/21+ where applicable. Gamble responsibly.

Probabilities are labeled by source — market, model, or combined. How the model works →