Orlando City SC vs Chicago Fire— market analysis & odds
Read this match in three steps
Probability is the common language. Venue prices are translated underneath so sportsbook and prediction-market users can compare the same idea.
1 · Most likely result
Chicago Fire
48% means we estimate about 48 chances out of 100. It is not a guarantee.
Overall: Orlando City SC 29% · Draw 22% · Chicago Fire 48%
2 · Understand the price
Chicago Fire
2.02 decimal odds
Coolbet · US +102
collected
This is not a dollar amount. A 1-unit stake would return 2.02 units total if successful.
3 · Compare probability
−1.1 percentage points
Our estimate is 48%; the price implies 50%. A positive difference is a reason to investigate, not proof of profit.
The price implies a higher chance than our estimate
Updated · overall, market, and model views are labeled separately
Why the model and market differ
Market and model are independent views, not competing answers. Their difference is shown in percentage points (pp) and is a prompt to investigate assumptions or missing information.
Market = probability from the designated reference market after bookmaker margin is removed. Model = independent Dixon-Coles-adjusted simulation. The Quick read uses the separately labeled overall estimate, which combines these inputs.
Every market, every book, and how the price moved
For each market: the reference book’s price with its margin removed, the most favourable price we collected and where, the difference between them, and the price history over the last 72 hours. Prices move — check the venue before acting.
Match result (1X2)
no-vig from William Hill alone · 11 books quote this market · margin removed 10.7%
Orlando City SC
3.22 at Marathonbet
collected
no-vig reference 3.3230.1% implieddifference −0.9pp
Draw
4.20 at Coolbet
collected
no-vig reference 4.4322.6% implieddifference −1.2pp
Chicago Fire
2.02 at Coolbet
collected
no-vig reference 2.1147.3% implieddifference −2.2pp
Draw drifted from 3.70 to 4.00 (+8.1%) over 23h, measured on William Hill.
Every book’s current price — 11 venues collected
| Book | Orlando City SC | Draw | Chicago Fire | Collected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 888sport | 3.00 | 4.00 | 1.91 | |
| Betclic | 2.78 | 3.28 | 1.88 | |
| Coolbet | 3.20 | Best price: 4.20 | Best price: 2.02 | |
| FanDuel | 3.20 | 4.10 | 2.00 | |
| LeoVegas | 3.10 | 3.85 | 1.90 | |
| Marathonbet | Best price: 3.22 | 3.90 | 1.98 | |
| Paddy Power | 3.10 | 4.00 | 1.95 | |
| Sky Bet | 3.00 | 3.75 | 1.91 | |
| William Hill | 3.00 | 4.00 | 1.91 | |
| Winamax | 3.00 | 3.75 | 1.86 | |
| Winamax | 2.95 | 3.70 | 1.84 |
Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.
Evidence and inputs
- Monte Carlo simulation: 50,000 runs (engine v1.1-dc-poisson-mktshares).
- Rest: Orlando City SC 18d, Chicago Fire 18d since last match.
- League scoring baseline: 3 goals/game.
- Home advantage applied for Orlando City SC.
- Lineups unconfirmed at last model run.
Potential value to investigate
No current price clears the publication threshold.
The market may be close to the estimate, the available data may be incomplete, or the price may have moved. Passing is a valid result.
Questions
Who is most likely to win Orlando City SC vs Chicago Fire?
Clauseground's combined estimate — a Dixon-Coles-adjusted model combined with a no-vig designated reference market — makes Chicago Fire the most likely outcome at 48%. That is a probability, not a promise: the other outcomes carry the remaining 52%.
How does Clauseground predict Orlando City SC vs Chicago Fire?
Clauseground uses an independent Poisson model with a Dixon-Coles low-score correction and removes the margin from a complete designated reference market. It shows the model and market views separately, then may calculate a market-specific combined estimate. Each probability retains its source label and timestamp.