Skip to content

Le Mans FC vs Toulouse — market analysis & odds

Read this match in three steps

Probability is the common language. Venue prices are translated underneath so sportsbook and prediction-market users can compare the same idea.

  1. 1 · Most likely result

    Toulouse

    39% means we estimate about 39 chances out of 100. It is not a guarantee.

    Overall: Le Mans FC 33% · Draw 28% · Toulouse 39%

  2. 2 · Understand the price

    Le Mans FC

    3.20 decimal odds

    Leovegas se · US +220

    collected

    This is not a dollar amount. A 1-unit stake would return 3.20 units total if successful.

  3. 3 · Compare probability

    +1.7 percentage points

    Our estimate is 33%; the price implies 31%. A positive difference is a reason to investigate, not proof of profit.

    Potential value to investigate

Updated · overall, market, and model views are labeled separately

Expert analysisFull detail remains available

Why the model and market differ

Market and model are independent views, not competing answers. Their difference is shown in percentage points (pp) and is a prompt to investigate assumptions or missing information.

Le Mans FCmodel 41% · market 30% (model vs market +10.3pp)
Drawmodel 29% · market 28% (model vs market +1.1pp)
Toulousemodel 31% · market 42% (model vs market −11.4pp)

Market = probability from the designated reference market after bookmaker margin is removed. Model = independent Dixon-Coles-adjusted simulation. The Quick read uses the separately labeled overall estimate, which combines these inputs.

Every market, every book, and how the price moved

For each market: the reference book’s price with its margin removed, the most favourable price we collected and where, the difference between them, and the price history over the last 72 hours. Prices move — check the venue before acting.

Match result (1X2)

no-vig from Pinnacle alone · 30 books quote this market · margin removed 5.0%

  • Le Mans FC

    3.20 at LeoVegas +1

    collected

    no-vig reference 3.3030.3% implieddifference −0.9pp

  • Draw

    3.60 at Betfred +4

    collected

    no-vig reference 3.6127.7% implieddifference −0.1pp

  • Toulouse

    2.28 at Marathonbet

    collected

    no-vig reference 2.3842.0% implieddifference −1.9pp

Le Mans FC held from 3.14 to 3.14 (+0.0%) over 24h, measured on Pinnacle.

2.122.943.7625 Sept, 10 UTC28 Sept, 09 UTC
Le Mans FCDrawToulouse
Each hour, the best price offered by any book quoting this outcome — 29–30 books across the window. Because the set of quoting books changes hour to hour, a step in the line can be a book arriving or leaving rather than a price moving; the movement figure above is measured on one book across two timestamps precisely to avoid that. Every hour in the window was collected. The no-vig reference is a separate calculation, from Pinnacle alone.
Every book’s current price — 30 venues collected
Current decimal price at every collected book for Match result (1X2). The best price in each column is marked.
BookLe Mans FCDrawToulouseCollected
888sport3.003.302.20
Betclic2.923.372.18
Betfred3.00Best price: 3.602.25
BetRivers3.053.452.17
Betsson3.053.602.20
Betway3.003.402.20
Bovada3.053.452.25
BoyleSports2.903.302.15
DraftKings3.053.352.25
FanDuel3.003.502.20
Grosvenor3.103.502.20
LeoVegasBest price: 3.203.602.25
LeoVegas2.953.352.20
LiveScore Bet2.953.302.12
Marathonbet3.163.48Best price: 2.28
NordicBet3.053.602.22
Paddy Power2.903.502.20
Pinnacle3.143.442.27
PMU2.903.302.10
Sky Bet3.003.502.20
Suprabets3.033.292.19
Tipico3.103.302.25
Unibet3.203.602.25
Unibet3.103.502.20
Unibet3.003.402.20
Unibet2.803.202.10
Virgin Bet2.953.302.12
William Hill3.003.302.20
Winamax2.853.502.15
Winamax2.703.252.05

Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.

Total goals 2.5

no-vig from William Hill alone · 12 books quote this market · margin removed 7.1%

  • Over 2.5

    1.80 at Bovada

    collected

    no-vig reference 1.8853.3% implieddifference −2.2pp

  • Under 2.5

    2.10 at Betsson +1

    collected

    no-vig reference 2.1446.7% implieddifference −1.0pp

Over 2.5 held from 1.75 to 1.75 (+0.0%) over 24h, measured on William Hill.

1.761.952.1425 Sept, 10 UTC28 Sept, 09 UTC
Over 2.5Under 2.5
Each hour, the best price offered by any book quoting this outcome — 12 books throughout across the window. Because the set of quoting books changes hour to hour, a step in the line can be a book arriving or leaving rather than a price moving; the movement figure above is measured on one book across two timestamps precisely to avoid that. Every hour in the window was collected. The no-vig reference is a separate calculation, from William Hill alone.
Every book’s current price — 12 venues collected
Current decimal price at every collected book for Total goals 2.5. The best price in each column is marked.
BookOver 2.5Under 2.5Collected
BetRivers1.732.06
Betsson1.75Best price: 2.10
BovadaBest price: 1.802.05
Grosvenor1.732.06
LeoVegas1.731.98
LeoVegas1.732.06
NordicBet1.722.08
PMU1.641.94
Tipico1.722.05
Unibet1.762.10
Unibet1.732.06
William Hill1.752.00

Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.

Both teams to score

no-vig from William Hill alone · 5 books quote this market · margin removed 6.0%

  • Both teams score

    1.62 at Betfred

    collected

    no-vig reference 1.7059.0% implieddifference −2.8pp

  • Not both teams score

    2.30 at William Hill

    collected

    no-vig reference 2.4441.0% implieddifference −2.5pp

Both teams score held from 1.60 to 1.60 (+0.0%) over 24h, measured on William Hill.

1.541.962.3825 Sept, 10 UTC28 Sept, 09 UTC
Both teams scoreNot both teams score
Each hour, the best price offered by any book quoting this outcome — 5 books throughout across the window. Because the set of quoting books changes hour to hour, a step in the line can be a book arriving or leaving rather than a price moving; the movement figure above is measured on one book across two timestamps precisely to avoid that. Every hour in the window was collected. The no-vig reference is a separate calculation, from William Hill alone.
Every book’s current price — 5 venues collected
Current decimal price at every collected book for Both teams to score. The best price in each column is marked.
BookBoth teams scoreNot both teams scoreCollected
BetfredBest price: 1.622.20
LeoVegas1.602.20
LiveScore Bet1.582.25
Virgin Bet1.582.25
William Hill1.60Best price: 2.30

Exchange lay prices, outlier soft-book prices, and any price above a per-market sanity ceiling are excluded — they are not prices a customer can take, and including them would inflate every “best price” on this page. The ceiling is a blunt rule and will occasionally discard a genuine long price. A dash means that book did not quote that outcome in the latest collected set.

Evidence and inputs

  • Monte Carlo simulation: 50,000 runs (engine v1.1-dc-poisson-mktshares).
  • Rest: Le Mans FC 27d, Toulouse 27d since last match.
  • League scoring baseline: 2.7 goals/game.
  • Home advantage applied for Le Mans FC.
  • Lineups unconfirmed at last model run.

Potential value to investigate

Le Mans FC

Match result+1.7pp differencecombined

3.20 at LeoVegas

combined fair 3.0430 books priced this outcomeno 24h reference

combined estimate 33%model 41% · market 30% (model vs market +10.3pp)

estimate 33% · price implies 31% · +5.3% expected return if the estimate is right

Combined estimate puts Le Mans FC at 33%; best collected price 3.20 at leovegas_se implies 31% — a +1.7pp calculated difference, not a guaranteed edge.

priced

Open the price-comparison viewEvery current comparison, with the price history and rationale, in the app.

Questions

Who is most likely to win Le Mans FC vs Toulouse?

Clauseground's combined estimate — a Dixon-Coles-adjusted model combined with a no-vig designated reference market — makes Toulouse the most likely outcome at 39%. That is a probability, not a promise: the other outcomes carry the remaining 61%.

How does Clauseground predict Le Mans FC vs Toulouse?

Clauseground uses an independent Poisson model with a Dixon-Coles low-score correction and removes the margin from a complete designated reference market. It shows the model and market views separately, then may calculate a market-specific combined estimate. Each probability retains its source label and timestamp.

Decision support, not betting advice. No guaranteed outcomes. 18+/21+ where applicable. Gamble responsibly.

Probabilities are labeled by source — market, model, or combined. How the model works →